Future Multiverse presents itself as a groundbreaking platform, a digital utopia promising the seamless integration of blockchain, NFTs, artificial intelligence, and hyper-realistic virtual environments.
It claims to be the next great evolution in digital economies, inviting investors to secure their stake in a future that, according to its marketing materials, is limitless in its possibilities.
However, behind these promises lies a troubling pattern of unsubstantiated claims, misleading partnerships, and questionable financial models. At the center of this operation is Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi, a man whose history reveals more about deception than innovation.
This blog will uncover the deep flaws within Future Multiverse and provide a critical examination of Dr. Kamalabadi’s past, his ties to known fraudsters, and the financial inconsistencies that make this company an extremely high-risk venture.
The Illusion of Future Multiverse
A close examination of Future Multiverse’s claims quickly reveals a pattern common to fraudulent ventures: a lack of tangible products, an overreliance on speculative investments, and a refusal to provide clear, verifiable information.
Overpromising Without Delivering
Future Multiverse promises a comprehensive ecosystem that includes a Web4 digital economy, AI-driven transactions, a fully integrated blockchain, and digital land ownership. Yet, there is no evidence of a working product, functional technology, or blockchain infrastructure to support these claims.
The company’s Lightpaper (a stripped-down version of a whitepaper) reads like a sales pitch rather than a technical document. It lacks the depth expected from a legitimate technology project and provides no verifiable proof that any of the claimed technology exists beyond conceptual marketing.
A Business Model That Raises Serious Concerns
Future Multiverse aggressively markets NFT-based land sales as one of its primary revenue streams. However, their pricing structure is both exorbitant and unjustifiable:
- $50 per square meter for digital real estate (compared to $4/month in established virtual worlds like Second Life).
- $1 per day per square meter in rental fees, which amounts to $365 per year for a single square meter of virtual space.
A rational investor must ask: What is the justification for these outrageous prices? The answer is simple—there is none. This model mirrors previous fraudulent schemes where early investors are promised high returns, only for the system to collapse once new buyers stop coming in.
The Troubling History of Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi
Dr. Kamalabadi markets himself as a visionary entrepreneur and geopolitical strategist, boasting of high-profile relationships with world leaders and governments. However, his history of financial disputes, deceptive business dealings, and questionable associations tell a very different story.
Court Judgment Against Kamalabadi for Financial Misconduct
In 2021, a Chinese court found Kamalabadi guilty of fraud in a financial dispute involving 2 million RMB ($280,000 USD). The details of the case reveal a pattern of deception that raises serious concerns about his integrity:
- In 2014, Kamalabadi persuaded a business partner, Jiang Jie, to transfer him 2 million RMB, promising lucrative oil industry partnerships.
- No contract was ever signed, and no business activity took place.
- When the investor requested a refund, Kamalabadi refused to return the money and continuously avoided repayment.
- The court ruled against him, determining that he had no legal basis to keep the funds and ordered him to repay the full amount with interest.
The fact that Kamalabadi ignored legal proceedings, refused to appear in court, and failed to present a defense only solidifies concerns about his lack of accountability and ethical business practices.
Fraudulent Claims of White House and African Government Support
One of the most egregious fabrications is Kamalabadi’s claim that the White House formally adopted the “Future Trends Africa Manifesto” as a continent-wide movement. This statement is not only false but entirely unsubstantiated.
There is no record of the White House endorsing or adopting this initiative, and established African development programs such as Agenda 2063 already existed long before Kamalabadi’s so-called “manifesto.”
This is a deliberate attempt to mislead investors and fabricate credibility where none exists.
Ties to Known Fraudsters and Ponzi Scheme Operators
A deeper investigation into Kamalabadi’s business dealings reveals his disturbing associations with known fraudsters and Ponzi scheme operators.
Connections to Sam Lee and Shavez Anwar
- Sam Lee: Co-founder of Blockchain Global, which has been linked to fraudulent crypto ventures that lured investors with false promises of high returns.
- Shavez Anwar (also known as Shavez Ahmed Siddiqui): Involved in fraudulent crypto schemes like “We Are All Satoshi” and “Boomerang,” which stole millions from investors.
Kamalabadi has been documented in conversations and collaborations with these individuals, raising serious concerns about whether Future Multiverse is another highly organized financial scam.
While there is no direct evidence linking Kamalabadi to their specific fraudulent activities, his willingness to associate with such figures is highly suspicious.
The Compliance Team’s Attempts to Silence Critics
When confronted about the lack of transparency, fake partnerships, and inflated claims, Future Multiverse’s so-called “Compliance Team” responded with legal threats and intimidation tactics.
Instead of providing verifiable evidence to disprove allegations, they:
- Threatened legal action against critics, without addressing any factual concerns.
- Refused to clarify their actual business structure, registration details, or governance model.
- Attempted to pressure journalists and investigators into signing Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to silence further scrutiny.
This is not the behavior of a legitimate company. It is a classic deflection strategy used by fraudulent businesses to avoid accountability.
Why Future Multiverse is a High-Risk Venture
Anyone considering involvement with Future Multiverse should be deeply concerned about the following:
- No tangible product: The entire business is based on selling overpriced digital land and NFTs without any working ecosystem.
- Fake partnerships and endorsements: Kamalabadi has repeatedly claimed government and White House support, all of which are demonstrably false.
- A leader with a history of financial misconduct: Kamalabadi has lost court cases for fraudulent business practices and has a history of refusing to return investor funds.
- Ties to crypto scammers and Ponzi schemes: His documented connections to Sam Lee and Shavez Anwar are highly alarming.
- Threats against critics: Instead of transparency, the company resorts to intimidation and legal threats to silence negative press.
Final Conclusion: Avoid Future Multiverse at All Costs
Future Multiverse is not a legitimate technology company. It is a speculative investment scheme that relies on inflated marketing, false credibility claims, and a misleading business model to lure in unsuspecting participants.
Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi is not a respected entrepreneur or global strategist. He is a businessman with a documented history of deception, financial misconduct, and fraudulent claims.
For those considering investing in Future Multiverse: reconsider your decision immediately. There is no evidence that this project will deliver anything beyond financial losses and legal trouble.
Protect yourself from financial fraud, do your research, and stay away from Future Multiverse and Dr. Farzam Kamalabadi5
***UPDATE 09-02-2025
Well, well, well. Looks like Future Multiverse L.L.C.-FZ doesn’t like being exposed. They’ve sent me a cease and desist letter through their legal team, trying to intimidate me into silence. Since I believe in full transparency, I’m making their legal threats public. If they had nothing to hide, why would they be so desperate to shut me up?
Below, you’ll find the cease and desist letter they sent me, my full response, and an explanation of why these legal threats won’t work.
The Cease and Desist Letter
On February 8, 2025, I received an email from Jeffrey Smith, Managing Attorney at LawVisory PLLC, representing Future Multiverse L.L.C.-FZ. The letter accuses me of defamation, claiming I’ve made false accusations, misleading statements, and unfounded allegations about their company.
Their demands:
- Stop talking about Future Multiverse
- Delete my videos, blog posts, and other content
- Publicly retract my statements
- Promise never to speak about them again
And if I don’t comply, they threaten legal action for damages and defamation.
This isn’t the first time a company facing scrutiny has tried to silence criticism with legal threats. But here’s the problem—everything I’ve reported is backed by verifiable evidence.
My Response to Future Multiverse
Because I don’t back down from bullies, here’s my official reply:
- Court Documents: Legal records confirm that individuals affiliated with Future Multiverse have been involved in financial disputes and legal proceedings related to fraudulent activities.
- Public Statements & Marketing Claims: Future Multiverse has made unverified and misleading claims regarding endorsements from government entities, including the White House and African governments, which lack independent verification.
- Business Practices: Multiple reports and testimonies highlight concerning investment schemes, high-risk token sales, and unverifiable technological claims.
- Based on facts that are substantially true
- A genuine opinion on those facts
- Concern matters of public interest
- File an Anti-SLAPP motion, seeking immediate dismissal of baseless defamation claims
- Counterclaim for damages, including legal costs incurred due to the meritless nature of the claim
- Subpoena records from Future Multiverse, requiring them to provide evidence of their financial dealings, partnerships, and technology claims in open court
Conclusion
Legal Threats Won’t Work – I’m Ready for Court
This cease and desist letter is nothing more than a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP), a tactic used to silence critics. Courts generally do not favor SLAPP lawsuits, especially when reporting is factual and serves the public interest.
If Future Multiverse actually proceeds with legal action, I am fully prepared to:
- File an Anti-SLAPP motion to seek immediate dismissal of the case
- Counterclaim for damages, including legal fees and costs
- Subpoena Future Multiverse’s financial records, contracts, and business dealings to be examined in court
For reference, the last time someone falsely accused me of defamation for $3.8 million, they filed a discontinuance in the New Zealand High Court just one and a half hours before I was awarded $27,500 in legal fees.
I stand by my reporting and will not be intimidated by empty legal threats.
Why Are They So Desperate to Shut Me Up?
If Future Multiverse was a legitimate, transparent company, wouldn’t they provide clear evidence to refute my claims instead of resorting to legal intimidation? Instead, they’ve chosen to:
- Dodge the facts
- Refuse to provide proof of legitimacy
- Use legal threats instead of transparency
What does that tell you?
Final Message to Future Multiverse
If you truly believe my statements are false, provide verifiable proof, and I will correct any inaccuracies.
But if you think a poorly written cease and desist letter will stop me from exposing shady business practices, think again.
I will continue my work exposing Ponzi schemes, scams, and fraudulent businesses, and Future Multiverse is no exception.
RE: Response to Your Request for Removal and Invitation to Clarify Future Multiverse
Dear Compliance Team,
Thank you for reaching out regarding my published opinions and observations about Future Multiverse. I appreciate your willingness to engage in a dialogue and provide clarity about the concerns I have raised.
First, let me assure you that my statements are based on my independent analysis of publicly available information, including the content of your website, associated materials, and actions by affiliates. My goal is to encourage transparency and provide potential investors with an informed perspective, as is my right under free speech and opinion laws.
Addressing Your Request
1. Defamation Allegations:
The observations I have published are rooted in verifiable elements, such as non-functional links, vague claims, and the absence of legal documentation or technical details on your site. These constitute fair criticism and opinion based on publicly available information and do not meet the legal threshold for defamation.
2. Content Removal:
I am willing to consider any evidence or documentation you can provide to address the specific red flags I have identified. If inaccuracies are demonstrated, I will gladly amend or retract the corresponding statements.
3. Public Correction or Retraction:
As of now, I do not see grounds for a retraction, as my content is an exercise of my right to express a critical opinion based on observable facts. However, I am open to receiving additional information to further understand your platform and clarify any misunderstandings.
Invitation to Open Dialogue
I welcome the opportunity to interview a representative from Future Multiverse in a transparent and public forum, such as my podcast or YouTube channel. This platform can provide your organization with a chance to address the concerns I have raised and present evidence supporting the legitimacy of your operations. I believe this open dialogue could benefit all parties and foster greater trust among potential investors.
To facilitate this, please let me know your availability for an interview. Alternatively, you may provide a written response to each of the red flags I outlined in my earlier communication.
Final Note
I trust you understand that opinions based on publicly available facts are protected under law, and issuing threats of legal action in response to such opinions may be viewed as an attempt to stifle legitimate public discourse. I encourage Future Multiverse to embrace transparency and address these concerns directly.
I look forward to your reply and to resolving this matter constructively.
Kind regards,
Danny de Hek
[The Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger]
———————
THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER
WEBSITE: dehek.com
PODCAST: podcast.dehek.com
BOOKINGS: calendly.com/dehek
YOUTUBE: youtube.com/dehek
“If you found our collaboration helpful, I’d be grateful if you could leave me a Review! It would help me better serve others and improve my skills. You can also support me by buying me a virtual cup of coffee ☕ at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dehek. Your gesture would help keep me energized and motivated to continue providing support. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you!”
Best Regards
Danny de Hek
Phone: +64 21 961 652 Email: [email protected]
On 6 January 2025 at 2:37:52 PM, Future Multiverse Support ([email protected]) wrote:
Request for Immediate Removal of Defamatory Content & Invitation to Discuss Future Multiverse
Dear Danny De Hek,
I am writing to address the false and damaging statements you have made about Future Multiverse on various platforms. While we respect open discussion and critical feedback, the claims you have published are unfounded, misleading, and harmful to our organization and its stakeholders.
Immediate Actions Required
1. Remove all defamatory content about Future Multiverse from your website, social media pages (including LinkedIn and X.com), and any other channels.
2. Issue a public correction and retraction of your statements on the same platforms where they were originally shared.
Should these actions not be taken within 72 hours, we will be compelled to consider all available measures to protect our reputation—this may include reporting the content to platform administrators and pursuing legal remedies for defamation and associated damages.
Invitation to Open Dialogue
In the interest of transparency and goodwill, we invite you to:
Schedule a call or virtual meeting with our team, where we can provide a detailed walkthrough of our platform, demonstrate ongoing developments, and address any questions you may have. We believe a direct conversation will clarify the nature and legitimacy of Future Multiverse.
If you wish to discuss this matter or arrange a call, please contact us at
[email protected]
[email protected]
We trust that you understand the gravity of this situation and will act quickly and responsibly to resolve this issue. We welcome the chance to clarify any misunderstandings in a constructive manner.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this serious matter.
Sincerely,
Compliance Team
Future Multiverse
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 9:20 AM DANNY : DE HEK wrote:
I’ve got some concerns about investing with your company I was hoping that you could answer some of my red flags?
Here are some red flags about Future Multiverse, based on the information provided:
1. Non-Functional Links
Observation: Links at the bottom of the site, including critical sections like “Compliance & Regulation,” “Terms of Use & Disclaimer,” and “Privacy Policy,” do not work.
Why It’s Concerning: Functional links are fundamental to transparency and compliance. Missing or broken links suggest either a lack of professionalism or an intentional effort to avoid scrutiny.
2. Overuse of Buzzwords
Examples: Terms like “Hyper-Realistic XR Multiverse,” “Web4,” “Hybrid POS/POA Blockchain,” and “Future Trends Catalyst” are vague and lack substance.
Why It’s Concerning: Legitimate projects typically provide clear, specific, and verifiable technical explanations. Buzzwords without meaningful context often indicate an attempt to sound advanced without delivering.
3. Lack of Clear Deliverables
Observation: The site promises grand concepts like “transformational processes,” “groundbreaking technologies,” and “limitless possibilities” but lacks details on tangible products, services, or outcomes.
Why It’s Concerning: Legitimate platforms outline concrete goals, timelines, and deliverables. The absence of these specifics raises doubts about the project’s legitimacy.
4. No Team Transparency
Observation: The website mentions “Team & Purpose” but provides no names, credentials, or contact information for key members.
Why It’s Concerning: Legitimate projects proudly display team members and their expertise. Anonymity is often a red flag in the crypto and blockchain space.
5. No Proven Track Record
Observation: Despite ambitious claims, there’s no evidence of prior achievements, successful launches, or existing partnerships.
Why It’s Concerning: New projects without a proven track record are inherently riskier, especially when making such sweeping claims.
6. Over-Promising Returns and Impact
Examples: Claims to “empower nations” and “transform reality” with no evidence to back up these statements.
Why It’s Concerning: Exaggerated promises are a hallmark of scams, designed to attract investors who are dazzled by hype rather than facts.
7. Fake Urgency
Examples: “REGISTER NOW & SAVE YOUR SEAT,” countdown timers for “Next Update & Announcement,” and “Coming Next.”
Why It’s Concerning: Scammers often use fake urgency to pressure individuals into making hasty decisions without due diligence.
8. Generic Contact Information
Observation: Only a single email address ([email protected]) is provided, with no physical address or phone number.
Why It’s Concerning: Legitimate businesses provide multiple channels for communication, including verifiable physical addresses.
9. Questionable “Blockchain” Details
Observation: The site mentions a “Proof of Stake / Proof of Authority” blockchain but provides no technical details, whitepapers, or audits.
Why It’s Concerning: Real blockchain projects release technical documentation for peer review. Lack of transparency suggests there may be no actual technology behind the claims.
10. Misuse of Nikola Tesla Quote
Observation: The site attributes a vague and unrelated quote to Nikola Tesla to lend credibility.
Why It’s Concerning: Misattributing or misusing quotes from historical figures is a tactic often employed by scams to appear more credible.
11. Focus on Selling Packages
Observation: The site heavily emphasizes product and service packages, including NFTs, avatars, and business spaces.
Why It’s Concerning: Focusing on selling speculative items (like NFTs) without a clear ecosystem to support them is a common tactic in scams.
12. Absence of Legal Documentation
Observation: Terms like “Compliance & Regulation,” “Patent & Licence Agreements,” and “Privacy Policy” are mentioned but not accessible.
Why It’s Concerning: Transparency around legal compliance is essential. The absence of this information suggests either a lack of compliance or an attempt to obfuscate.
13. No Evidence of Partnerships
Observation: The site claims to partner with “nations, organizations, and institutions” but does not name or verify any of these partnerships.
Why It’s Concerning: Falsely claiming partnerships is a common strategy to create the illusion of credibility.
14. Vague and Inaccessible “Guidebook”
Observation: The “Guidebook” is advertised as an interactive resource but is not accessible on the site.
Why It’s Concerning: Promised resources that are not available are indicative of a lack of follow-through or substance.
15. No Social Proof or Community Presence
Observation: There is no evidence of a community, active user base, or independent reviews.
Why It’s Concerning: Legitimate projects often have active communities on platforms like Discord, Telegram, or Twitter. The absence of this presence raises concerns about legitimacy.
16. Overemphasis on Pre-Launch Hype
Observation: The site is centered on a “VIP Pre-Launch” without offering substantive content or functionality.
Why It’s Concerning: This focus on pre-launch excitement is often used to generate interest and investment in projects that may never materialize.
Conclusion
Based on these red flags, Future Multiverse appears highly questionable. The lack of transparency, broken links, vague claims, and overuse of buzzwords suggest it may be more of a marketing façade than a legitimate project. Anyone considering engagement with this platform should proceed with extreme caution.
———————
THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER
WEBSITE: dehek.com
PODCAST: podcast.dehek.com
BOOKINGS: calendly.com/dehek
YOUTUBE: youtube.com/dehek
“If you found our collaboration helpful, I’d be grateful if you could leave me a Review! It would help me better serve others and improve my skills. You can also support me by buying me a virtual cup of coffee ☕ at https://www.buymeacoffee.com/dehek. Your gesture would help keep me energized and motivated to continue providing support. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you!”
Best Regards
Danny de Hek
Phone: +64 21 961 652 Email: [email protected]
PUBLIC RESPONSE TO FUTURE MULTIVERSE’S CEASE & DESIST LETTER
Well, well, well. Looks like Future Multiverse L.L.C.-FZ doesn’t like being exposed. They’ve sent me a Cease & Desist letter through their legal team, trying to silence my investigation into their business practices.
Since I believe in full transparency, I’m making their legal threats public for everyone to see—because if they had nothing to hide, why would they be so desperate to shut me up?
Below, you’ll find:
The Cease & Desist letter they sent me
My full response
An explanation of why these legal threats won’t work
CEASE & DESIST LETTER (Received February 8, 2025)
[Insert full text of their letter here]
WHAT THEY’RE TRYING TO CLAIM
Their letter accuses me of defamation, claiming I’ve made:
• False accusations
• Misleading statements about their company
• Unfounded allegations of fraud and shady connections
They demand that I:
1️⃣ Immediately stop talking about them
2️⃣ Delete my videos and blog posts
3️⃣ Publicly retract my statements
4️⃣ Promise never to say anything about them again
And if I don’t? They threaten legal action for damages and defamation.
MY RESPONSE TO FUTURE MULTIVERSE
Because I don’t back down from bullies, here’s my official reply:
Dear Mr. Smith,
I acknowledge receipt of your Cease & Desist letter dated February 8, 2025. However, I reject the claims outlined in your letter and do not intend to comply with your demands.
My reporting is based on verifiable facts, legal documents, and public records, which substantiate concerns about Future Multiverse’s business practices and affiliations.
1️⃣ NO DEFAMATION – EVERYTHING I PUBLISHED IS BACKED BY EVIDENCE
New Zealand’s Defamation Act 1992 states that a statement is only defamatory if it is false and unsubstantiated. My reporting is based on:
✅ Court judgments against individuals affiliated with Future Multiverse
✅ Business records and public filings
✅ Statements and marketing claims from Future Multiverse itself
You’re free to dispute the facts, but you can’t claim defamation when the truth is publicly documented.
2️⃣ FAIR COMMENT & PUBLIC INTEREST DEFENSE
My content is protected under fair comment and public interest laws because:
✅ It is based on substantially true facts
✅ It represents a genuine opinion
✅ It concerns matters of public interest
Future Multiverse has marketed investment opportunities and digital assets to the public, making them subject to public scrutiny. If they can’t handle that, perhaps they shouldn’t be in business.
3️⃣ NO REMOVAL OR RETRACTION
Your demand to delete my content is denied. Unless you provide concrete evidence disproving my findings, my content remains public and unchanged.
4️⃣ LEGAL THREATS WON’T WORK – I’M READY FOR COURT
This Cease & Desist letter is a classic intimidation tactic, also known as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP). Courts generally do not favor SLAPP lawsuits, especially when reporting is factual and serves the public interest.
If Future Multiverse actually proceeds with legal action, I am fully prepared to:
⚖️ File an Anti-SLAPP motion to seek immediate dismissal of the case
⚖️ Counterclaim for damages, including legal fees and costs
⚖️ Subpoena Future Multiverse’s financial records, contracts, and business dealings to be examined in court
For reference: The last time someone falsely accused me of defamation for $3.8 million, they filed a discontinuance in the New Zealand High Court just 1.5 hours before I was awarded $27,500 in legal fees.
I stand by my reporting and will not be intimidated by empty legal threats.
SO, WHY ARE THEY SO DESPERATE TO SHUT ME UP?
If Future Multiverse was a legitimate, transparent company, wouldn’t they want to provide clear evidence to refute my claims? Instead, they’ve chosen to:
❌ Dodge the facts
❌ Refuse to provide proof of legitimacy
❌ Use legal threats instead of transparency
Ask yourself—what does that tell you?
FINAL MESSAGE TO FUTURE MULTIVERSE
If you truly believe my statements are false, provide verifiable proof and I’ll happily correct any inaccuracies.
But if you think a poorly written Cease & Desist letter will stop me from exposing shady business practices, think again.
I will continue my work exposing Ponzi schemes, scams, and fraudulent businesses—and Future Multiverse is no exception.
Danny de Hek
The Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger