“If your balance is ‘hyper-compounding’ but you can’t withdraw a cent, you don’t have an investment — you have a story being told to you on a screen.”

This investigation is written for investors who sense that something has gone badly wrong, even if it took time to accept it.

For months, people were promised regular distributions and reassured that delays were temporary. While money failed to arrive, dashboards continued to update, balances continued to rise, and investors were encouraged to wait just a little longer.

Many did — because the system was designed to make waiting feel rational.

Since 1 September, we have stated publicly that GOLIATH VENTURES INC is operating as a large-scale Ponzi-style scheme. At the time, that warning was uncomfortable to hear and easy to dismiss. Four months later, patience has turned into panic. What this blog documents is not opinion or hindsight, but verifiable evidence gathered directly from inside the platform. It explains how so-called hyper-compounding is being used to delay escalation when payments fail, how legitimate financial platforms behave very differently, and why this moment matters.

Most importantly, it records something unprecedented. Investors have stopped protecting the system. They are handing over backend access, contracts, exit agreements, transaction records, and communications — allowing their cases to be verified, video-documented, preserved, and escalated to authorities. This is not commentary. This is not theory. This is evidence being assembled in real time.

People Are Handing Over the Keys

Over the last few weeks, the dynamic has changed completely.

People are no longer sending cropped screenshots or asking whether their concerns are valid. They are handing over full access — contracts, dashboards, exit agreements, wire instructions, correspondence, and payment histories.

Not fragments.
Not interpretations.
Total visibility.

One investor, whose identity is being protected, provided full backend access to his account inside the GOLIATH VENTURES investor portal.

Not screenshots.
Not summaries.
Live access.

That access allowed us to independently verify what he was shown, what he signed, what he deposited, what he received, and exactly what happened when he formally requested his money back.

This investigation no longer relies on what people say.
It relies on what the platform itself shows.

What the Backend Shows — and What It Does Not

When logged in, the system presents a carefully curated image of legitimacy.

The backend contains the original agreement, identity documents, beneficiary details, the assigned partner managing the account, contribution records, distribution entries, and multiple months marked as hyper-compounded. It also records withdrawal requests and internal status changes.

At first glance, it looks complete.

What it does not provide is control.

There is no self-service exit.
No crypto withdrawal function.
No bank transfer initiation.
No custody control.

Every attempt to leave requires human permission, routed through the assigned partner.

A legitimate platform gives users control.
This platform gives users gatekeepers.

That difference only becomes visible once money stops flowing — which is exactly where investors now find themselves.

Hyper-Compounding as a Retention Tool

Hyper-compounding is not a recognised financial product.

In legitimate finance, compounding simply refers to reinvesting returns over time.

Here, it serves a very different purpose.

Inside the backend, balances continue to rise even as withdrawals fail. The visual message is growth. The behavioural outcome is delay. Investors are conditioned to wait because the screen suggests waiting is working.

It isn’t.

Numbers on a dashboard are not money.
Money is money.

When withdrawals fail while balances continue to “grow,” hyper-compounding stops being a strategy and becomes a mechanism designed to hold people in place.

The Withdrawal Request That Changes Everything

In the anonymised case reviewed, the investor formally requested a withdrawal in accordance with the agreement they signed.

That agreement sets out a clear process. A withdrawal request is made by notice, and the company states it will use reasonable efforts to return the requested amount within five to seven business days. The contract allows for delays only in narrowly defined circumstances, such as suspected malicious activity, system issues, or exchange disruptions — and even then, those delays are framed as exceptions, not the rule.

In this case, the standard withdrawal window elapsed. No qualifying exception was cited, no resolution was provided, and the requested funds were not returned.

At that point, the situation changes fundamentally. This stops being about explanations, operational delays, or temporary liquidity issues. It becomes non-performance under the company’s own written terms.

What follows is critical. Even after the contractual withdrawal period had passed, the investor’s account continued to display balance growth through hyper-compounding entries. Showing ongoing gains while a valid withdrawal request remains unmet is not a neutral accounting choice. It reflects a system that maintains the appearance of progress while failing to meet a clear contractual obligation.

This is the point where waiting ceases to be patience — and becomes harm.

What We Do With the Information People Provide

When investors come forward with full documentation, we do not simply store it.

Each case is actively worked.

Contracts are verified against backend data. Timelines are reconstructed. And critically, video walkthroughs are recorded — showing exactly what the investor was shown versus what actually occurred.

These are not videos for content.

They are evidence packages.

They allow regulators and law-enforcement agencies to see the system operate exactly as investors experienced it, without interpretation, spin, or memory gaps.

This work is slow.
It is methodical.
And it is not being done anywhere else at this level.

Patterns Emerging Across Multiple Cases

As more investors come forward, the same behaviours repeat.

Not once.
Not occasionally.
Consistently.

Across cases already documented, the same pressure points appear again and again:

  • Withdrawals require approval instead of execution
  • Timelines shift repeatedly without written confirmation
  • Some investors continue to receive payments while others stall
  • Balances continue to hyper-compound while exits fail
  • Communication becomes controlled or restricted
  • KYC reviews, fees, or “compliance issues” appear late, without settlement proof

No single element proves fraud.

Patterns across hundreds of millions of dollars do.

What Investors Need to Provide

If you want your case taken seriously, summaries are useless.

Investigations move on original material, not impressions.

In practical terms, that means providing agreements, withdrawal requests and responses, backend access or recordings, proof of funds sent and received, and the identities of the sponsor and partner managing your account.

If conditions changed late — fees, forced hyper-compounding, restricted communication channels — that information matters.

Victims are protected.
Names are redacted.

But evidence is non-negotiable.

How to Contact Me

I am based in New Zealand.
A good time to phone me is NZST 9am to 5pm.

Signal (preferred for sensitive material): https://signal.me/#eu/V2-CCUaxUO9JE7auA_X2aILDY1S2XqchUWc6s6DjYIr6xLjac_pNN6naCNDONX1h

WhatsApp: https://wa.me/+6421961652

Email: danny@dehek.com

When Waiting Becomes the Risk

“Fraud doesn’t survive on belief — it survives on delay.”

If your balance is still hyper-compounding while withdrawals fail, stop waiting.

A number you cannot access is not an asset.
It is a delay mechanism designed to keep you quiet while time is used against you.

Screenshots will not save you.
Reassurance emails will not save you.
Protecting the person who introduced you will not save you.

Evidence is the only thing that moves authorities.

If you have been affected, this is the moment.

Document what you were shown.
Verify what actually happened.
Escalate while the evidence still exists.

This is the only way forward.

A Request for Investors and Insiders to Come Forward

GOLIATH VENTURES RECOVERY

If you are an investor, introducer, or insider with direct knowledge of Goliath Ventures Inc, this is where people are coming when they have reached the point of no longer wanting to deal with this alone. A growing number of affected parties are choosing to connect, compare experiences, and place their information alongside others who are facing the same unanswered questions, delayed exits, and shifting explanations. The value of the group is not gossip or speculation—it is perspective, corroboration, and the collective weight that comes from seeing patterns emerge across many individual cases.

This WhatsApp Group has become a focal point for people who are done waiting, done being isolated, and done wondering whether they are the only one. Members are individuals who want to engage directly, understand how their experience fits into the wider picture, and contribute to a broader effort grounded in action rather than silence. It is also a space that draws attention precisely because of the seriousness of the work being done—enough that even those on the other side of this situation are paying close attention.

If you want to be part of that conversation, and you are ready to step forward rather than sit on the sidelines, you can request access here:

https://chat.whatsapp.com/Efh9mnIRWVe2FSjASwAOgO

Previously in This Series on Goliath Ventures

  1. Glossy Promises, Shaky Contracts
    Goliath Ventures Exposed – Glossy Promises, Shaky Contracts, and the Dark Reality of Guaranteed Returns
    Where it all began: inflated promises of 60% returns backed by contracts that were flimsy at best.
  2. The Compliance Illusion
    Goliath Ventures Exposed Part 3: Christopher Delgado, Matt Burks, BlackBlock and the Compliance Illusion
    The smoke-and-mirrors routine — how Burks and BlackBlock tried to pose as “independent” while being insiders.
  3. The Smear Campaign Claim
    Chris Lord Delgado Claims “Smear Campaign” – Goliath Ventures Exposed in My Full Response
    Delgado’s pushback — calling legitimate questions a “smear campaign” while victims kept piling up.
  4. The Bookkeeper’s Vanishing Act
    The Bookkeeper’s Vanishing Act: Chris Delgado, Nadia Bringas, and Goliath Ventures
    When the money trail grew hot, Bringas dissolved her company in Florida overnight and popped back up in Wyoming.
  5. The Fake Audit
    Pull Money While You Can! Goliath Ventures Ponzi Exposed by FAKE Audit. Florida Ponzi Scheme SCAM
    A so-called “audit” that turned out to be nothing more than a Mailchimp blast with zero financial data.
  6. The Missing FinCEN Registration
    Goliath Ventures Inc (Christopher Delgado) and the Missing FinCEN Registration: Why It Matters
    Digging into why a real investment firm would never operate without this registration — unless it was hiding.
  7. Collapse and Clawbacks
    Goliath Ventures Inc Florida Ponzi Collapse, Coming Clawbacks and Arrests
    The unraveling accelerates: clawbacks loom, and indictments draw closer.
  8. The Securities Question
    The Unregistered Securities Problem: Why Goliath Ventures’ Contracts Are Likely Illegal
    Breaking down why Goliath’s contracts were never legal in the first place — a fatal flaw in their setup.
  9. What Real Funds Look Like
    What Real Quant Funds Look Like Vs. Goliath Ventures, FL Ponzi Scam
    Today’s deep dive: exposing how every part of Goliath’s structure collapses under scrutiny.
  10. Stolen money, gifts, and uneconomical deals
    Who Is Still Profiting From Goliath Ventures Inc, Orlando Ponzi? Don’t Drop The Soap.
    Unusual developments connected to the Goliath Ventures Ponzi scheme, which is now imploding.
  11. FBI Director Kash Patel, Ron DeSantis and even Andrew Tate
    Goliath Ventures Ponzi: Verlin Sanciangco & My Liquidity Partner (MLP) Scam Rebranded.
    Goliath Ventures Inc ponzi scheme has been running for a lot longer than most people realize.
  12. I just got sued for telling the truth
    Danny vs Goliath: New Zealand Journalist Sued by Christopher Delgado’s GOLIATH VENTURES INC.
    I uncovered what I believe is a large-scale Ponzi scheme.
  13. You now have 3 copyright strikes
    Dirty Tactics: How GOLIATH VENTURES INC Is Abusing YouTube’s Copyright System to Silence Journalism.
    Your channel (as well as YouTube channels associated with it) is scheduled to be terminated in 7 days.
  14. Crypto Crash!
    Crypto Prices Crash! GOLIATH VENTURES Investors Should Be Very Worried.
    Questions Goliath Ventures Investors Should Be Asking
  15. Filed a 22‑page Motion to Dismiss
    Florida Orlando Ponzi Scheme Sues New Zealand Journalist, $150,000 Bribe Attempt.
    This lawsuit isn’t about protecting a reputation—it’s about damage control and intimidation.
  16. You didn’t escape the scam — you benefited from it
    Whistleblower or Opportunist? The Anatomy of a Non-Whistleblower Who Protected Goliath Ventures.
    To show what a real whistleblower looks like, and what one doesn’t.
  17. The Banking Breakdown
    GOLIATH VENTURES INC’s Secret Bank Switch: The Collapse Behind the “Transparency” Spin.
    A false transparency update masking a banking crisis and ongoing promotion.
  18. Director of Administration at Goliath Ventures Inc
    Stephen Davis: The Fire Chief Who Walked Out of the Firehouse and Straight Into a Financial Inferno.
    There is one path still open to Stephen Davis — the only path that honours the uniform he once wore.
  19. Goliath Ventures Inc has now collapsed
    Goliath Ventures Payouts Stop: Insiders Pull 10’s of Millions While Everyone Else Waits.
    Paid their romantic partners and family members tens of millions since 12/Nov/2025.
  20. Behavioural pattern is the same
    Andrew Tate’s Hyperliquid Wipeout – And Why Goliath Ventures Investors Should Pay Attention.
    High-risk gamblers calling themselves “genius traders,” sitting on terrible risk management, and using other people’s trust.
  21. Goliath Ventures December Breakdown: What Investors Must Know
    Goliath Ventures: Chris Delgado and Jonathan Mason Ruin Christmas! Canadians, Hide Your Wallets!.
    Delgado’s deceit deepens as victims face mounting pressure, collapsing trust and urgent accountability.
  22. Tomo Marjanovic’s “Brotherhood” Post
    Tomo Marjanovic, #GoliathStrong and the Miami Dinner That Exposes Goliath’s Collapse. 
    And loyalty is the last thing a failing scheme demands before the crash.
  23. Rapidly Unfolding Financial Collapse
    Goliath Ventures Inc Dec 15–18: Payouts Promised – Where is The Money? Where is Christopher Delgado?
    Investigating Goliath Ventures’ missing payouts, executive distancing, jurisdiction shifts, and evidence pointing to a collapsing Ponzi structure.
  24. Broken Promises, Vanishing Transparency, Accountability Looms
    The Collapse of GOLIATH Ventures Inc: Missed Promises, Narrative Control: The Calm Before the Storm
    Delayed distributions, opaque explanations, missing proof, leadership silence, heavy spending, and growing investor coordination emerge.
  25. A story of control, delay, and retreat.
    Goliath Ventures Inc: The Deleted Video, The Rewritten Narrative, And The Quiet Exit
    A documented analysis of what was said, what was removed, and why it matters as withdrawals remain frozen.
  26. Before the Collapse: How GOLIATH Was Built Without Proof
    The Origins of GOLIATH VENTURES INC: How Proximity Replaced Proof as Millions Were Raised (this article)
    Tracing the social networks, abandoned ideas, and unverified claims that enabled Goliath to raise millions before anything real was ever built.
  27. When Withdrawals Fail, Dashboards Replace Real Money
    Hyper-Compound Illusions: How GOLIATH VENTURES INC Leaves Investors Watching Dashboards Not Payments (this article)
    Investors are watching balances grow while withdrawals fail. This investigation exposes how hyper-compounding is used to delay exits.

Disclaimer: How This Investigation Was Conducted

This investigation relies entirely on OSINT — Open Source Intelligence — meaning every claim made here is based on publicly available records, archived web pages, corporate filings, domain data, social media activity, and open blockchain transactions. No private data, hacking, or unlawful access methods were used. OSINT is a powerful and ethical tool for exposing scams without violating privacy laws or overstepping legal boundaries.

About the Author

I’m DANNY DE HEK, a New Zealand–based YouTuber, investigative journalist, and OSINT researcher. I name and shame individuals promoting or marketing fraudulent schemes through my YOUTUBE CHANNEL. Every video I produce exposes the people behind scams, Ponzi schemes, and MLM frauds — holding them accountable in public.

My PODCAST is an extension of that work. It’s distributed across 18 major platforms — including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, and iHeartRadio — so when scammers try to hide, my content follows them everywhere. If you prefer listening to my investigations instead of watching, you’ll find them on every major podcast service.

You can BOOK ME for private consultations or SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS, where I share first-hand experience from years of exposing large-scale fraud and helping victims recover.

“Stop losing your future to financial parasites. Subscribe. Expose. Protect.”

My work exposing crypto fraud has been featured in: